Italy's 5-year citizenship referendum 2025

In 2024-2025 Italy actively discussed an initiative to halve the residency requirement for the naturalization path - to reduce the number of years of legal residence before a citizenship request from ten to five. The matter went as far as a nationwide referendum, the vote on which took place in the summer of 2025. The topic is time-sensitive and politically charged: below is a breakdown of what exactly was put to the vote, how the quorum mechanism works, what outcome took shape per the community and the media, and why this hasn't changed the current rule yet. This is not legal advice and not a political position - we only describe the essence of the matter; verify the current status and the official result on interno.gov.it.

What the referendum proposed

The essence of the initiative was simple: to halve the minimum period of continuous legal residence after which a foreigner is entitled to request Italian citizenship by residency (cittadinanza per residenza) - from ten years to five. A basic breakdown of all the paths to citizenship, the language requirements, and the review timelines is collected in the overview Italian citizenship: paths and timelines.

Formally, this was an abrogative (abrogativo) referendum under Article 75 of the constitution. Such a format does not write a new law from scratch, but repeals part of an existing norm. In this case the vote would have removed part of the article of the 1992 citizenship law, which at one time raised the bar: before that law the benchmark was precisely five years, and the 1992 reform stretched the period to ten. That is, the initiative essentially proposed returning to an earlier order.

It's important to understand that the question affected precisely the residency path and primarily people from countries outside the European Union. It did not directly affect other grounds: for recognized refugees the right to apply arises after about five years, for spouses of Italian citizens - roughly after 2 years (3 if the couple lives abroad) and half that with shared children. More on the fastest path through marriage is in the article Citizenship by marriage and continuous residency.

I want to clear up the confusion right away: they weren't voting to hand out passports or to simplify entry. They were changing one figure in the naturalization norm - ten years of residence to five. All the other conditions, language and income, stayed in place, and marriage and descent went their own way and weren't affected by the question at all.

What the vote would and would not change

To avoid false expectations, it's worth disentangling what the initiative affected and what it did not.

• Only the residence period for the naturalization path would change - from ten years to five.
• The language requirement (confirmed Italian at the B1 level), the requirement for stable income, and the check for the absence of a criminal record would remain unchanged - this was not a relaxation in substance.
• The referendum did not touch the logic and procedures for issuing residence permits (permesso di soggiorno) - the rules of residence are in principle not rewritten through such a mechanism.
• Refugees and spouses of citizens would by and large not be affected by the change: for them the periods are already shorter.

In other words, passing the threshold would have meant that a person from a non-EU country who legally lived in Italy for five years instead of ten and meets all the other conditions could apply sooner. How long the path from residenza to passport takes in principle and what stages it consists of is shown in the overview Stages of obtaining EU citizenship.

I think many overestimated the effect. It's not a loophole and not an amnesty: language, taxes, a clean criminal record certificate - everything stayed as it was. It's just that those who already live by the rules for years would be allowed to start five years earlier. It didn't give a fundamentally different speed.

How the quorum works and why it decides everything

The key feature of an abrogative referendum in Italy is the turnout quorum. It's not enough for the "for" votes to outnumber the "against." It's needed that more than half of all eligible voters come to the polls (the threshold of 50 percent plus one vote). If turnout is below this threshold, the result is not counted, whatever the difference in votes.

It was precisely around the quorum that all the dynamics were built. Supporters of the initiative campaigned to come and vote. Some major political forces, on the contrary, called for not going to the referendum - the calculation was that with low turnout the threshold simply wouldn't be reached and the initiative would fail on its own. According to the community, Italians generally don't go to referendums often: over the past decades the quorum on such votes was reached only in isolated cases.

The trick is in the mechanism itself. You don't have to campaign against it at all - it's enough for people to just stay home. No turnout above half - no result. So the bet was not on out-arguing, but on the turnout threshold not coming together.

The vote of 8-9 June 2025 and its outcome

According to the community and the media, the vote took place over the weekend, on 8-9 June 2025 (Sunday and Monday). Already by the evening of the first day it was clear that turnout was running noticeably below the required threshold: it varied greatly by region, and in a number of areas only a fifth of voters came to the polls.

By preliminary data, the outcome took shape as follows: about 64 percent of those who voted spoke in favor of reducing the period (more than nine million people), that is, by the ratio of votes the majority was confidently on the side of "for". But the overall turnout remained around 30 percent - less than half of the electorate. And that means the quorum was not reached, and the initiative did not take effect, despite the support of the majority of those who came.

Here caution with the figures is important. This is data per the community and media reports; at the moment of counting they were still being clarified and were coming in by region. Verify the exact final result, the final turnout, and the official wording against the primary sources - the publications in the Gazzetta Ufficiale and the materials of the Ministry of the Interior. Don't rely on a single news item as the finale.

By the preliminary summaries the picture was unambiguous: the overwhelming majority of those who came voted in favor, and that's a strong signal. But what decides is not the sympathy of those who voted, but the turnout - and it didn't reach half. So legally the proposal did not pass. Look at the exact final numbers in the official publication, not in retellings.

Honestly, the outcome didn't surprise me. Many Italians simply didn't know about this referendum - the topic barely sounded in the major media. And without wide publicity it's nearly impossible to gather half the country for a vote, no matter how you feel about the question itself.

Why the ten-year period still applies now

The main practical takeaway: since the quorum was not reached, the previous norm remained untouched. As of today, the benchmark for citizens of non-EU countries is still about ten years of continuous legal residence, counted from the registered residenza. A reduction to five years did not happen as a result of this vote.

At the same time, the topic of citizenship reform in Italy is periodically raised again - in the public sphere, in parliamentary initiatives, in public campaigns. This means the period and conditions can theoretically change in the future too, separately from the past referendum. So approach the question as a time-sensitive one: before applying, always verify the current period and requirements on interno.gov.it, rather than relying on a figure from an old article or news note.

For those already on the ten-year path, in fact nothing changed - we counted our years from the residence registration, and we still count them. But I wouldn't write the topic off: talk of reform comes up regularly. Just verify the current period right before applying, so as not to go by an outdated figure.

How this fits into the broader debate about cittadinanza reform

The referendum itself was part of a large and long-standing discussion about how Italy grants citizenship. Supporters of reducing the period usually cite demographic and economic arguments: the population is aging, the birth rate is low, and a shorter, more predictable path to citizenship makes the country more attractive for specialists who legally live, work, and pay taxes. As an example, other EU countries that have recently softened their naturalization periods are often mentioned.

Opponents, in turn, emphasize preserving national identity and the idea that integration should be gradual. Against the backdrop of this debate the alignment around the quorum took shape: some called to vote, others

• to abstain. By estimates cited in the community, the change could potentially have affected a significant number of migrants who have long lived in the country and their children.

We deliberately don't take a political side here - the article's task is to describe the essence of the question and its outcome, not to campaign for or against. The decision to vote is the personal matter of everyone who has Italian citizenship and the right to vote.

Sources and caveats

The figures on turnout, the percentage "for", the dates, and the circle of affected people in this article are taken from discussions in the community and media reports and are time-sensitive. At the moment of counting the data was still being clarified. Before relying on them, verify the current status and the official result against the primary sources. This article is of a reference nature and is not legal advice; resolve questions about your specific period and conditions for applying by the official rules and, if necessary, with a dedicated specialist.

Related articles

• Italian citizenship: paths and timelines - the ten-year period by naturalization, B1 language, income, and the real review timelines.
• Citizenship by marriage and continuous residency - the fastest path, about 2 years (3 abroad, half that with children), why the referendum didn't concern it.
• Stages of obtaining EU citizenship - what steps the path from residenza to passport consists of.
• Italian citizenship: an overview of the paths - a comparison of the grounds in one place.

Official sources

• interno.gov.it - the Ministry of the Interior: the current requirements for citizenship by residency and by marriage, the current timelines, and the online application.
• gazzettaufficiale.it - the Gazzetta Ufficiale: official publications, including announcements and the results of referendums.

Frequently asked questions

What was the referendum on citizenship in 5 years about?

According to the community and the media, the vote put forward a proposal to reduce the minimum period of legal residence after which you can apply for citizenship by naturalization (cittadinanza per residenza), from ten years to five. This was an abrogative (abrogativo) referendum under Article 75 of the constitution - it would have brought back the earlier five-year period, which was raised to ten in 1992. The question did not directly concern other paths to citizenship (marriage, descent). This is not legal advice - verify the current status on interno.gov.it.

When did the vote take place and what was the result?

According to the community and the media, the vote took place on Sunday-Monday, 8-9 June 2025. By preliminary data, about 64 percent of those who voted spoke in favor of reducing the period, but turnout remained noticeably below half of the electorate, so the quorum (the threshold of 50 percent plus one) was not reached and the initiative did not take effect. Verify the exact final figures and the official result against the primary sources - gazzettaufficiale.it and interno.gov.it.

What is the quorum and why did it decide everything?

According to the community, for an abrogative referendum in Italy a quorum is needed: more than half of all eligible voters must vote, otherwise the result is not counted regardless of the ratio of votes for and against. In this vote the majority was on the side of 'for', but fewer than half came to the polls, so formally the proposal did not pass. Verify the counting procedure on official resources - this is not legal advice.

So does the ten-year period apply anyway now?

According to the community and the media - yes: since the referendum did not reach the quorum, the previous norm remained unchanged, and the benchmark for citizens of non-EU countries is still about ten years of continuous residence. But citizenship laws are periodically revised, so verify the current period before applying on interno.gov.it. This is not legal advice.

Who would the reduced period have affected if it had passed?

According to the community, primarily those who moved to Italy from non-EU countries, more often for work motives, live legally, and pay taxes. For certain categories the periods are already shorter: for recognized refugees - about five years, for spouses of Italian citizens - about 2 years (3 if you live abroad) and half that with shared children. The proposal did not change the language and other requirements. The exact conditions are on interno.gov.it.

Related materials - Italian citizenship

• Italian citizenship by marriage: B1, terms
• Permesso to EU citizenship in Italy 2026
• Permanent residency in Italy: permesso UE
• Italian B1 for citizenship: CILS, CELI

Next stepLegalization & sworn translationApostille or consular legalization, then traduzione giurata - the exact path per document and country.